SaaS Link Building Agencies

Hybrid FIXED POSITION

Inbound Blogging

Ranked 4 of 29 . This position is fixed, not earned — the computed score is 77.2, which is 3 on score alone.

inboundblogging.com ↗

77.2 Score, on 95% of the weight

Operated by people connected to the publisher of this site. Its position is fixed and its score is computed on exactly the same criteria as everyone else's.

The numbers

Domain Rating
63
+3 over twelve months
Organic traffic
570
visits a month, 166 keywords
Referring domains
1,094
3,540 live backlinks
Traffic value
$530
per month, Ahrefs estimate

Domain Rating, September 2025 to August 2026

Ahrefs · read 2026-09-01

60 63

What it publishes

Pricing

$150–$300/link · $2,200–$5,400/mo

  • $ 2,200/mo
  • $ 3,500/mo
  • $ 5,400/mo

No minimum term stated. Entry is a single $150 link with no retainer.

Source · read 2026-09-01

Link quality floor

DR 20+

Banded per tier: DR 20-34 Basic, DR 35-44 Standard, DR 45-70 Pro, DR 70+ Elite.

As published by the agency. We cannot audit whether it is enforced.

Source · read 2026-09-01

SaaS specialisation

3/4

named clients are software companies — a sample under five, so the score halves this component.

SaaS service page: yes · view it

“Trusted SaaS SEO & content partner”

Fit

Written by the publisher from the sourced data below.

Arguments for

  • Publishes per-link prices with the DR band each one buys: $150 at DR 20-34 rising to $300 at DR 70+, plus three monthly SaaS SEO tiers at $2,200, $3,500 and $5,400.
  • There is no retainer to enter. A single $150 link is the whole commitment.
  • Three of the four clients it names are software companies, and it runs two separate SaaS service pages rather than one SaaS mention.
  • Nine listed services, from link building through to content and digital PR.

Arguments against

  • Its cheapest link at $150 is the seventh cheapest of the ten agencies here that publish a per-link price - four times Stan Ventures' $37.
  • Names only four clients, so the SaaS share rests on a small sample and the scoring model halves that component accordingly.
  • Neither SaaS page carries a case study, so none of the published prices is attached to a published result.
  • DR 63 sits exactly on the list median, but produces only 570 organic visits a month - a stronger link profile than the search presence it currently returns.

Score, by criterion

  • saas specialisation 55
  • pricing transparency 100
  • link quality floor 100
  • own authority 60
  • minimum commitment 80
  • service depth 75

Not scored: longevity — not published, so dropped and the remaining weights renormalised to 95% rather than guessed. How this works.

Services and firmographics

White label
Yes
  • SaaS SEO
  • SaaS Link Building
  • SaaS Content Writing
  • HARO Link Building
  • Digital PR
  • Link Building Outreach
  • White Label Link Building
  • SEO Content Writing
  • AI SEO

Clients it names

Printed on the agency's own site. A marked name is one we classify as selling software; the rule and every call are on the method page.

  • ScreenRec
  • SiteGround
  • Semrush
  • Brosix

Sources

  • CORRECTION vs 2026-08-26: The 2026-08-26 dataset recorded this agency as quote-only with a flat DR 70 floor. Both were wrong; the site publishes tiered per-link pricing with DR bands.
  • Operated by people connected to the publisher.

◆ Back to the ranking